Re: [OOPS] related to swap?

[Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]

On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 19:38 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > As i said, i really doubt that the memory is at fault here, it has done
> > several passes over the memory but not all tests. I can give it a go
> > though, but i really doubt it'll find anything.
> 
> If it doesn't cost you much time (ie. do it overnight) it could save some
> developers a lot of time.

Well, the memory passes test 1-5 and 8. The 32 bit thingies all fail on
4 dimms, so either 4 dimms are broken or the test is broken for amd64.

Anyways, i noticed that the memory clocking got skewed when all the
memory was in the machine, so i've removed 1gb of memory.

> > The kernel i run is a plain 2.6.16.1 from kernel.org (i have heard that
> > you can actually compile gentoos own these days)
> 
> OK, good.

2.6.16.2 now... And a new nvidia driver...

-- 
Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 200 bytes --]