From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751033AbWDLJT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:19:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751096AbWDLJT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:19:56 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:32418 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbWDLJT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:19:56 -0400 Subject: Re: GPL issues From: Alan Cox To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Pramod Srinivasan , David Weinehall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:28:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1144834135.1952.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2006-04-12 at 11:06 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > I don't know an answer (not even a rough one), since there is AFAICS one > example of what you describe: the CiscoVPN kernel module. The source is > available (so you have a chance to run it on any kernel you like), but it's > got a typical EULA. No sign of GPL. A matter some people have on their list of targets...