From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030234AbWDONEw (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:04:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030236AbWDONEw (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:04:52 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:21411 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030234AbWDONEv (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:04:51 -0400 Subject: RE: GPL issues From: Steven Rostedt To: Alan Cox Cc: davids@webmaster.com, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" In-Reply-To: <1145102131.28279.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1145102131.28279.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:04:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1145106287.27407.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:55 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > O > What you say may have been true two hundred years ago but the IPR laws > of the world have been growing ever more tangled and self contradictory > since then, like a badly maintained perl script. > Please don't insult perl by associating it with IPR laws ;-) (even if it is true) -- Steve