From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Xen/Xenomai
From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <200604261857.03441.rlenglet@domain.hid>
References: <FDBBB5CC70676540B3EF7CFE83FD94E0210DD1@domain.hid>
	<200604261857.03441.rlenglet@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:29:10 +0200
Message-Id: <1146126550.8136.15.camel@domain.hid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

Hi,

> > Would it make sense to port (or to integrate) Xenomai in such
> > virtual environment? (the notion of a Xenomai domain might
> > correspond to a virtual machine).
> 
> I would rather say that both are means to create domains (in the 
> general sense of the term, cf. ISO RM-ODP), but of a different 
> nature. In Xenomai objects in domains are tasks, in Xen objects 
> are operating systems / virtual machines. IMHO, I don't see how 
> they could fit together.

Why you think that Xen and Xenomai can't fit together?
As far as i know Xen and Adeos are very similar goals.

Regards,
Alessio