From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: octane indice Subject: Re: firewall with failover - ct_sync ? Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:58:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1146157094.4450f8263e46c@webmail.alinto.com> References: <1145895856.444cfbb0eee53@webmail.alinto.com> <20060424164204.GA21760@galois.math.uni-paderborn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Maximilian Wilhelm Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <20060424164204.GA21760@galois.math.uni-paderborn.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org En réponse à Maximilian Wilhelm : > > 1. does ct_sync works? > > Yes, at least for me :) > good :) > > 2. a) Must I use quilt? > > quilt does just apply add the patch files listed in the series > file in the order listed there. You can do this manually if > you like (or dislike quilt). > I just don't know quilt. I'll try it. > > 2. b) Where I grab the patch files? > > For 2.6: > http://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/branches/netfilter-ha/ > Ok. I have to learn subversion first. I just know the CVS way or patch way to patch sources. > (My patches are against the "normal" ct_sync version found in > the "linux-2.6" subdirectory of the link above.) > I should patch _two_ times? Let's take an example: I download linux-2.6.16, then patch with http://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/branches/netfilter-ha/ then patch with the http://vvv.barbarossa.name/files/ct_sync/ct_sync_2.6.16-fix.patch ? > I did not get the linux-2.6-multigroup stuff running stable > with the latest kerne up to now. Maybe I'll put my lasting > patches for a running-but-unstable-version to the webpage > these days. > > > 3. Is there another documentation? > > I only know of a german Linux-Magazin article at > http://www.linux-magazin.de/Artikel/ausgabe/2005/12/linux-ha-fw/linux-ha- fw.html > I don't speak german, I'll try to get it with google translate > > 5. The link beetween the two machines must be an ethernet > > link? > > I have old boxes with two PCI port only, but parrallel link >> is OK with plip. > > ct_sync expects an ethernet interface for syncing. > You cannot use anything different. > PLIP is an ethernet link (sort of). If name "plip" is a problem, is there a way to cheat it with udev? > ------------------- Fin du message d'origine --------------------- "Ce Caillou-là" un conte en téléchargement gratuit sur http://www.Manuscrit.com