From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965182AbWD1FYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:24:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965188AbWD1FYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:24:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:38616 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965182AbWD1FYC (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:24:02 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller From: Mike Galbraith To: MAEDA Naoaki Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20060428013730.9582.9351.sendpatchset@moscone.dvs.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> References: <20060428013730.9582.9351.sendpatchset@moscone.dvs.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:25:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1146201936.7523.15.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > Andrew, > > This patchset adds a CPU resource controller on top of Resource Groups. > The CPU resource controller manages CPU resources by scaling timeslice > allocated for each task without changing the algorithm of the O(1) > scheduler. > > Please consider these for inclusion in -mm tree. This patch set professes to be a resource controller, yet 100% of high priority tasks are uncontrolled. Distribution of CPU among high priority tasks isn't important, but distribution of what they leave behind is? -Mike