From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1030284AbWD1HLy@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030284AbWD1HLy (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:11:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030285AbWD1HLy
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:11:54 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59039 "HELO mail.gmx.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030284AbWD1HLx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:11:53 -0400
X-Authenticated: #14349625
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: MAEDA Naoaki <maeda.naoaki@jp.fujitsu.com>, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <4451AEA4.1040108@sw.ru>
References: <20060428013730.9582.9351.sendpatchset@moscone.dvs.cs.fujitsu.co.jp>
	 <1146201936.7523.15.camel@homer>  <4451AEA4.1040108@sw.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:11:28 +0200
Message-Id: <1146208288.7551.19.camel@homer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:56 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> I'm also pretty sure, that CPU controller based on timeslice tricks 
> behaves poorly on burstable load patterns as well and with interactive 
> tasks. So before commiting I propose to perform a good testing on 
> different load patterns.

Yes, it can only react very slowly.

	-Mike