From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030441AbWD1PjF (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:39:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030443AbWD1PjF (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:39:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:31169 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030441AbWD1PjE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:39:04 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller From: Mike Galbraith To: Hirokazu Takahashi Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, maeda.naoaki@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20060428.225541.124090656.taka@valinux.co.jp> References: <200604282011.36917.kernel@kolivas.org> <44520581.3090404@jp.fujitsu.com> <200604282309.32320.kernel@kolivas.org> <20060428.225541.124090656.taka@valinux.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:39:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1146238743.7980.7.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:55 +0900, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote: > I think you can introduce some threshold to estimate whether > a process should be treated as an interactive process or not > while vanilla kernel defines it statically. Hmm. What do you mean by static? It is dynamic to my eyes. The entire mechanism is a dynamic priority mechanism. If you know of anything that might help differentiate interactive tasks, please speak up :) It's really a bugger of a problem. -Mike