From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Direct I/O bio size regression
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:25:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147019145.15364.236.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060426023031.GH611708@melbourne.sgi.com>
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:30 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Got any data that you can share with us?
>
The thread was from July 2004 and was called:
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce]
[patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption
Patch
Also some info in thread:
Re: [patch]
voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-M5
> Wrt latency, is the problem to do with large requests causing short
> term latency? I thought that latency minimisation is the job of the
> I/O scheduler, so if this is the case, doesn't this indicate a
> deficiency of the I/O scheduler? e.g. the I/o scheduler could split
> large requests to reduce latency, just like you merge adjacent
> requests to reduce the number of I/Os and keep overall latency
> low...
>
I think you are talking past each other - Jens is referring to scheduler
latency, not IO latency.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-07 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 6:14 [PATCH] Direct I/O bio size regression David Chinner
2006-04-24 7:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-24 9:05 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-24 14:56 ` David Chinner
2006-04-24 18:47 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 2:30 ` David Chinner
2006-04-26 5:28 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 15:41 ` David Chinner
2006-04-26 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-07 16:25 ` Lee Revell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-24 17:06 Al Boldi
2006-04-24 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-24 20:59 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-25 7:52 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-25 10:45 ` Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1147019145.15364.236.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.