All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hardware button support for Wireless cards
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:12:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147720370.3067.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605151801.06379.mb@bu3sch.de>

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:01 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2006 17:27, you wrote:
> > mwallis@serialmonkey.com said:
> > > Some people are saying that instead of throwing and ACPI event we should be
> > > either use hotplug or internally just disable the radio and somehow inform
> > > the dscape stack that the radio has been disabled.
> > >
> > > What are peoples thoughts here, should we 
> > >
> > > A. be handling this within our drivers and doing "what the user expects" and
> > > disabling the hardware radio, or 
> > 
> > On my HP laptop with bcm43xx wireless, the button disables the radio in
> > HARDWARE, and afaict the driver has no idea about it. The driver notices
> > that it's not connected and happily starts scanning again, unaware that
> > anything is wrong.
> 
> There are registers on the bcm43xx chip (0x158 and 0x49A) that indicate
> some "Radio is hardware-disabled" state. We currently don't use that flag
> correctly in the driver. Could you please assist me on testing if your switch
> actually toggles the bit?
> I think best place for this would be on irc.freenode.net #bcm-users

When those bits get set in the register, is the radio already disabled?
ie, for the bcm43xx chip, is it really force-disabled by the button, or
does the driver have some control?

Dan



  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-15 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-15 12:57 Hardware button support for Wireless cards Mark Wallis
2006-05-15 13:25 ` Jiri Benc
2006-05-15 13:59   ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 14:06 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-05-15 14:37 ` Dan Williams
2006-05-15 15:12   ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 16:20     ` Jouni Malinen
2006-05-16  3:10       ` Mark Wallis
2006-05-25 15:15         ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 16:19   ` David Zeuthen
2006-05-15 15:27 ` Jason Lunz
2006-05-15 16:01   ` Michael Buesch
2006-05-15 19:12     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2006-05-15 19:32       ` Michael Buesch
2006-05-15 19:46       ` Jason Lunz
2006-05-15 21:42         ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 20:08   ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147720370.3067.14.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=lunz@falooley.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.