From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: Doubt on implementing .readi and .readn methods Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:19:18 -0400 Message-ID: <1147727959.13948.40.camel@mindpipe> References: <4464E1B7.6070601@instant.com.br> <4468DF11.4000000@instant.com.br> <1147725511.13948.29.camel@mindpipe> <4468EB0C.6030909@instant.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4468EB0C.6030909@instant.com.br> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 17:56 -0300, Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > >On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 17:05 -0300, Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote: > > > > > >>Cheers, > >>Juan > >>P.S.: By the way, how many people here would find this functionality a nice thing to have? (Besides me of course) > >> > >> > >What will it give us that JACK doesn't? > > > > > Erm... (does a quick search of what JACK does) not having to recode the app? > Yes, that's the main difference ;-) > OK, but anyway you got me curious. If one of my apps wasn't proprietary, > and I decided to alter both to use JACK instead of ALSA, you say I could > do acoustic coupling? > Yes, it's exactly what JACK was designed for. There are some things JACK isn't suitable for (like VOIP due to the lack of resampling). Lee ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642