From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Subject: RE: Maximum number of subdirectories Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:10:24 +0400 Message-ID: <1147860624.6478.23.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> References: <5502B4E900B1A04AAA35CB57979B8C9A2472A8@spi-mail2003.spitech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <5502B4E900B1A04AAA35CB57979B8C9A2472A8@spi-mail2003.spitech.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Sinang, Danny" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 17:07 +0800, Sinang, Danny wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > By current limit, are you pertaining to ReiserFS (v3.x) or Reiser4 ? > for both. > Regards, > Danny > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir V. Saveliev [mailto:vs@namesys.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:46 PM > To: Sinang, Danny > Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com > Subject: Re: Maximum number of subdirectories > > Hello > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 23:25 +0800, Sinang, Danny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am a newbie to ReisferFS / Reiser4. > > > > I've been searching the archives and Google for a definite answer as > > to what the maximum number of subdirectories under a directory is. A > > Dec, 2003 article ( http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=510028 ) > > says it's 64,536. Is this still true ? > > > no, that was for old format of reiserfs. > > > If not, then what is the current limit for both ReiserFS and Reiser4 ? > > current limit for both is 2^32. > > > > > Regards, > > Danny > > > > > >