All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg"
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:59:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147957143.7632.8.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147935878.7481.20.camel@homer>

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 09:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> OK, after some brief testing, I think this is a step in the right
> direct, but there is another problem.  In the case where the queue isn't
> empty, the stated intent is utterly defeated by the on runqueue bonus.

The overly verbose one liner below could serve as a minimal ~fix.

Prevent the on-runqueue bonus logic from defeating the idle sleep logic.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

--- linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c.org	2006-05-18 08:38:13.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c	2006-05-18 14:47:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -917,6 +917,16 @@ static int recalc_task_prio(task_t *p, u
 			 * with one single large enough sleep.
 			 */
 			p->sleep_avg = ceiling;
+			/*
+			 * Using INTERACTIVE_SLEEP() as a ceiling places a
+			 * nice(0) task 1ms sleep away from promotion, and
+			 * gives it 700ms to round-robin with no chance of
+			 * being demoted.  This is more than generous, so
+			 * mark this sleep as non-interactive to prevent the
+			 * on-runqueue bonus logic from intervening should
+			 * this task not receive cpu immediately.
+			 */
+			p->sleep_type = SLEEP_NONINTERACTIVE;
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * Tasks waking from uninterruptible sleep are



  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-18 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-08 23:18 Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg" Tim Chen
2006-05-09  0:43 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-09  1:07   ` Martin Bligh
2006-05-12  0:04   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-13 12:27     ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-13 13:07       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14 16:03     ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-15 19:01       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-15 23:45         ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-16  1:22           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-16  1:44             ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-16  4:10           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-16 23:32           ` Tim Chen
2006-05-17  4:25             ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-17  4:45               ` Peter Williams
2006-05-17  5:24                 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-17  8:23             ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-17  9:49               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-17 10:25                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-17 11:42                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-17 12:46                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-17 13:41                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-17 15:10                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-17 17:21                           ` Ray Lee
2006-05-17 19:33               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-18  0:35                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-18  1:10                   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-18  1:38                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-18  5:44                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-18  5:52                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-18  7:04                           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-18 12:59                             ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-05-19  1:10                               ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-18 23:17                           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-19  1:30                             ` [PATCH] sched: fix interactive ceiling code Con Kolivas
2006-05-19  2:02                               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-19  9:40                               ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-19 14:37                               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-19 16:19                                 ` tim_c_chen
2006-05-18 23:34                           ` Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg" Chen, Kenneth W
2006-05-19  1:07                             ` Con Kolivas
2006-05-16  4:07         ` Mike Galbraith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-18  4:01 Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147957143.7632.8.camel@homer \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.