From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: mailing list filters? Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:09:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1147979399.2576.11.camel@mindpipe> References: <4465DCA6.2020205@gmail.com> <4468B96A.7030707@redfish-solutions.com> <4468C0F2.1000406@instant.com.br> <1147720227.13948.2.camel@mindpipe> <4468D7C4.2050504@instant.com.br> <1147722048.13948.9.camel@mindpipe> <20060518201722.2faedde3@SiRiUS.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060518201722.2faedde3@SiRiUS.home> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Thomas Kuther Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 20:17 +0200, Thomas Kuther wrote: > well it's like 90/10 S/N ratio, yes. > My spamassassin runs hot with this list. *hint* :) > (thank god for it!) But, you can see in the headers that SF already runs everything through SA. However some of the obvious spam gets a very low spam score (3-5). Do you have any theory about that? Is SF's spamassassassin just poorly tuned? Lee ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642