All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
Subject: Re: 2GB MMC/SD cards
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:17:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149578221.5520.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605222908.GC4996@cosmic.amd.com>

On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 16:29 -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure what the community stance is on using the simplified specs.
> I do believe the answer lies definitively within, but I'll refrain from
> quoting it to avoid any legal complaints.  For the longest time, my gut
> feeling has been that 512 byte writes were always accepted - but since all of
> our 2G and 4G cards support WRITE_BL_PARTIAL, we haven't had a chance to 
> prove the argument one way or the other.
> 
> We first heard about very large card issues from one of our customers, and
> we haven't heard any more problems since we gave them a patch to force the
> sector size on all SD/MMC cards to 512 bytes.  Thats just anecdotal evidence,
> but it is food for thought.

For what its worth this is the feeling I get from the users of the
Zaurus kernels as well. For the PXA driver, there is the added
complication that it doesn't support block sizes > 1023 but I've had no
complaints since I limited it to 512.

Richard


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-06  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29 14:00 2GB MMC/SD cards Pierre Ossman
2006-06-03 14:15 ` Russell King
2006-06-03 15:02   ` Russell King
2006-06-03 18:40   ` Matt Reimer
2006-06-03 21:13     ` Pierre Ossman
2006-06-05 22:29       ` Jordan Crouse
2006-06-06  7:17         ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2006-06-05 22:52       ` Pierre Ossman
2006-06-07  9:08         ` Pierre Ossman
2006-06-07 16:58           ` Russell King
2006-06-07 20:36             ` Pierre Ossman
2006-06-08 23:01               ` Pierre Ossman
2006-06-22 15:08                 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2006-08-13 10:14                 ` Daniel Drake
2006-08-22 15:19                   ` Juha Yrjola
2006-08-22 17:00                     ` Jeff Chua
2006-08-23 18:28                     ` Pierre Ossman
2006-08-25  9:07                     ` Russell King
2006-06-03 21:11   ` Pierre Ossman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1149578221.5520.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=jordan.crouse@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.