From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750810AbWFGEJ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:09:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750818AbWFGEJ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:09:56 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:58243 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810AbWFGEJz (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:09:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI PM: call platform helpers properly From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Adam Belay Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Len Brown In-Reply-To: <1149648774.7831.217.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1149497171.7831.160.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1149553874.559.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1149648774.7831.217.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:09:35 +1000 Message-Id: <1149653375.27572.111.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 22:52 -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > Hmm, do you know of any example firmware scenarios that make the entire > state transition? We might need a separate callback. I think the > changes in this patch are at least an improvement over the current > behavior, especially for ACPI PM functions. Well, do we know precisely what ACPI does/needs for example here ? Ben.