From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbWFGFY3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 01:24:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750910AbWFGFY3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 01:24:29 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:65478 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750850AbWFGFY3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 01:24:29 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler From: Mike Galbraith To: Kallol Biswas Cc: Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <478F19F21671F04298A2116393EEC3D527431D@sjc1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> References: <478F19F21671F04298A2116393EEC3D527431D@sjc1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:27:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1149658045.8439.18.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 14:58 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote: > Thanks for help. We do not see the issue if every netserver's priority is set to 19 with setpriority() call. FYI, there have been changes to the scheduler since 2.6.11 days that reduce the likelihood of this scenario somewhat. -Mike