From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net (mustang.oldcity.dca.net [216.158.38.3]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99B4B67C89 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:05:39 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: sleep / wake-up From: Lee Revell To: Guennadi Liakhovetski In-Reply-To: References: <53107f6e0606101503x4f84cbc0j6f92c601fa464c36@mail.gmail.com> <1149980531.14253.92.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:05:40 -0400 Message-Id: <1149984341.14253.97.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 01:38 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Yes: "ACPI" - we are talking about a (embedded) PPC... But I thought > you could "simulate" that without ACPI too. AFAIU, ACPI is the way > hardware (motherboard / laptop) manufacturers tell you about system's > configuration, including how to enter S3. In its absence suspending > every (e.g., embedded) system you have to _know_ the hardware. E.g., > what do they do on Apple ppc laptops? You don't have ACPI there. Is > there any generic system there or did they just study every new > ppc-mac and handled it specially? It seems that PPC Macs have a hardware PMU: http://www.resexcellence.com/linux_icebox/01-31-02.shtml And that some embedded devices handle this at the hardware level with no OS support needed: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2001-February/010179.html So AFAICT there's no standard like ACPI - each board does it differently. Lee