From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932320AbWFMAMn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:12:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932669AbWFMAMm (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:12:42 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:4252 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932320AbWFMAMm (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:12:42 -0400 Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) From: David Woodhouse To: Matthias Andree Cc: Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060612090521.GE11649@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20060612090521.GE11649@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:12:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1150157570.11159.87.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.1.dwmw2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:05 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > I believe checking Received: headers of backscatter (that term is used > in Postfix discussions for "back falling junk") catches a fair amount > of that junk. Backscatter is trivial to deal with by other means -- like BATV. Presumably we'd never accept bounces to the list addresses _anyway_, since the lists never send mail from their canonical address. -- dwmw2