From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750902AbWFNTWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:22:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750879AbWFNTWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:22:41 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:63651 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750816AbWFNTWk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:22:40 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler From: Mike Galbraith To: Kallol Biswas Cc: Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Radjendirane Codandaramane In-Reply-To: <478F19F21671F04298A2116393EEC3D531CF15@sjc1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> References: <478F19F21671F04298A2116393EEC3D531CF15@sjc1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:26:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1150313179.7674.25.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:56 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote: > Yes, all 3 clients run on a Redhat 9 box. Ok, what do the priorities and cpu distribution look like? -Mike