From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FqmZc-0002Eb-Iw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:47:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FqmZa-0002CU-9u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:47:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmZa-0002C9-0m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:47:26 -0400
Received: from [144.140.93.195] (helo=omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fqmiv-00019T-Hf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:57:05 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.150] (really [60.228.216.204])
	by omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP
	id <20060615074720.QCUV25409.omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com@[10.0.0.150]>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:47:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] VMware Player
From: kadil <ksadil@bigpond.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <44903504.1070707@gmx.de>
References: <44902362.2000406@gmail.com>
	<200606141601.59936.paul@codesourcery.com> <4490310D.7060303@gmail.com>
	<44903504.1070707@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:47:22 +1000
Message-Id: <1150357642.5679.7.camel@excellence.kicks-ass.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: ksadil@bigpond.net.au, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:

> Btw. regarding your earlier question about a Qemu GUI similar to VMware: 
> AFAIK at least two people have posted GUI patches for Qemu (look in the 
> mailing list archive); so far there has been little response to that, 
> and I suppose that these patches "just" need testing and some feedback 
> (as they seem to be pretty intrusive, with changing the video output and 
> the input handling stuff).
> 
Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
consistent across os's, and part of the original distro.  I think
take-up would be huge (well huge-er, current takeup is huge)

Kim