From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751585AbWFQB0m (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:26:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751557AbWFQB0m (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:26:42 -0400 Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:49170 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbWFQB0l (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:26:41 -0400 X-Server-Uuid: F962EFE0-448C-40EE-8100-87DF498ED0EA Subject: Re: tg3 timeouts with 2.6.17-rc6 From: "Michael Chan" To: "Juergen Kreileder" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <87bqsslk9e.fsf@blackdown.de> References: <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC041BD16@NT-IRVA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> <87k67glrvl.fsf@blackdown.de> <1150494161.26368.39.camel@rh4> <87bqsslk9e.fsf@blackdown.de> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:27:32 -0700 Message-ID: <1150507652.26368.46.camel@rh4> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) X-TMWD-Spam-Summary: SEV=1.1; DFV=A2006061609; IFV=2.0.6,4.0-7; RPD=4.00.0004; RPDID=303030312E30413039303230372E34343933353843302E303030322D412D; ENG=IBF; TS=20060617012635; CAT=NONE; CON=NONE; X-MMS-Spam-Filter-ID: A2006061609_4.00.0004_2.0.6,4.0-7 X-WSS-ID: 688D85C30HW32681119-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 02:05 +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > Michael Chan writes: > > Please try turning TSO off to see if it makes a difference: > > > > ethtool -K eth0 tso off > > Seems to work fine with TSO disabled. > Thanks for the information. We'll look into it. If possible, please send me (using private email) an ethereal trace of a sample of the packets sent by the tg3 chip right before the NETDEV_WATCHDOG timeout. In the meantime, I wonder if we should disable TSO by default on the 5780 chip for 2.6.17.