From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932335AbWFSKQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:16:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932344AbWFSKQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:16:44 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:2433 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932335AbWFSKQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:16:44 -0400 Subject: Re: About the fixes of /drivers/serial/8250.C in 2.6.17-rc6 for avoiding habbg-up From: Alan Cox To: Russell King Cc: gouji , "'LKML'" In-Reply-To: <20060619093219.GA26941@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <000d01c6934c$f25c9870$f4647c0a@GOUJI> <1150708994.2503.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060619093219.GA26941@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:31:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1150713102.2871.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-06-19 am 10:32 +0100, ysgrifennodd Russell King: > > Yes, there is a bug in this version that was not in the one I submitted, > > someone added an improvement. > > I disagree - in the non-oops_in_progress case, your version and the > merged version are 100% identical - see So they are, sorry the one that differs was the original Red Hat Enterprise Linux patch. > I don't have the initial email from ysgrifennodd gouji, and neither > do the lkml archives. What's the problem? Sysrq for one