From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Tucker Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:29:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1152278993.20248.154.camel@trinity.ogc.int> References: <20060705.200325.74731166.davem@davemloft.net> <1152163503.20248.98.camel@trinity.ogc.int> <20060706.235320.92562667.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from es335.com ([67.65.19.105]:52051 "EHLO mail.es335.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932139AbWGGN3m (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:29:42 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060706.235320.92562667.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:53 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Tom Tucker > Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:25:03 -0500 > > > This patch is about dotting I's and crossing T's, it's not about > > foundations. > > You assume that I've flat out rejected RDMA, in fact I haven't. I > really don't have enough information to form a final opinion yet. > There's about a week of emails on this topic which I need to read > and digest first. I realize that there is a tremendous amount of work out there and this is just one thread. > > What I am saying, however, is that we need to understand the > technology and the hooks you guys want before we put any of it in. Absolutely. > > I don't think that's unreasonable. Not at all. Let me know if I can help. Tom