From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2/2] /proc output - add CPU usage stats From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <44AF78FB.9010304@domain.hid> References: <44AECB5F.1080100@domain.hid> <1152348554.5065.5.camel@domain.hid> <44AF7644.40506@domain.hid> <1152350185.5065.10.camel@domain.hid> <44AF78FB.9010304@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:28:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1152350904.5065.16.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 11:20 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 11:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Philippe Gerum wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 23:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> Yet another (hopefully the final) version of my attempt to add simple per-thread CPU > >>>> usage statistics. This variant now prints the usage in percent directly via > >>>> /proc/xenomai/stat. > >>> Merged, thanks. > >>> > >> Tabs seems to got lost on merge (I think my posted patches where ok). > > > > Looking at the mail archive on GNA, it seems they were not. I've planned > > to rerun Lindent over the sources anyway. > > Hmm, strange. Checking the versions received via my own subscription > (PATCH 1/2 and 2/2), there are tabs at lines where there are non in > trunk now. > > It's indeed a minor issue, but I wonder if I should continue to post > patches inlined or fall back to attachments again. I don't know what went wrong, but the space/Tab issue appeared specifically with your latest patches a week ago or so; so far, patching with -l solved the issue, so that's not a big deal, provided a reindentation is done afterwise to suppress unwanted spaces. I've never had any problem using your attachments verbatim, though. > > Jan > -- Philippe.