All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Joseph Fannin <jfannin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
Subject: [PATCH] remove unnecessary barrier in rtc_get_rtc_time
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:57:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152849473.1883.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711074541.GA5263@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 09:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> ouch! That's another HPET bug i believe. AFAICS rtc_get_rtc_time() is 
> really not meant to be called from any sort of timer interrupt! In 
> particular this looping code:
> 
>         while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100) {
>                 barrier();
>                 cpu_relax();
>         }

Seeing this after reading the volatile thread and then Chase's patch:

([PATCH] Make cpu_relax() imply barrier() on all arches)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115237514517594&w=2

(yes I'm a bit behind in my LKML reading... 1663 messages to go)

There's no reason to have a barrier in this loop.

-- Steve

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Index: linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/rtc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc1.orig/drivers/char/rtc.c	2006-07-13 23:40:58.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/rtc.c	2006-07-13 23:41:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -1238,10 +1238,8 @@ void rtc_get_rtc_time(struct rtc_time *r
 	 * Once the read clears, read the RTC time (again via ioctl). Easy.
 	 */
 
-	while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100) {
-		barrier();
+	while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100)
 		cpu_relax();
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Only the values that we read from the RTC are set. We leave



  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-14  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-09  5:05 [LOCKDEP] 2.6.18-rc1: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage Joseph Fannin
2006-07-09  6:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-09  7:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-11  5:11     ` Joseph Fannin
2006-07-11  7:45       ` [patch] lockdep: HPET/RTC fix Ingo Molnar
2006-07-14  3:57         ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-08-05 21:59         ` Joseph Fannin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1152849473.1883.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
    --cc=jfannin@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.