Re: data corruption with 2.4.25 and datalogging patches

["Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1418 bytes --]

Hello

On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 14:20 +0200, Francisco Javier Cabello wrote:

> Hello Vladimir,
> 
> # reiserfsck -l /tmp/reiserfsck.log -y --check /dev/hdc1
> 
> Standard output:
> ======================================================
> Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/hdc1
> Will put log info to '/tmp/reiserfsck.log'
> ###########
> reiserfsck --check started at Fri Jul 14 14:09:33 2006
> ###########
> Replaying journal..
> Reiserfs journal '/dev/hdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed
> Checking internal tree..finished
> Comparing bitmaps..Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped
> 1 found corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree
> ###########
> reiserfsck finished at Fri Jul 14 14:13:29 2006
> ###########
> ======================================================
> 
> /tmp/reiserfsck.log:
> ======================================================
> bad_internal: vpf-10320: block 23868569, items 91 and 92: The wrong order of 
> items: [410810496 11321 0x16abca00 ??? (15)], [11312 11321 0x22f1c880 DIR 
> (3)]


such corruptions used to be considered as hardware bugs. Memory failure,
for instance. Did you ever run memtest on your systems?


>  the problem in the internal node occured (23868569), whole subtree is skipped
> vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs.
> ======================================================
> 



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2460 bytes --]