From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764AbWGQVgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:36:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750768AbWGQVgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:36:10 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:23709 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWGQVgI (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:36:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix] From: Kylene Jo Hall To: Greg KH Cc: stable@kernel.org, Greg KH , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Zwane Mwaikambo , Justin Forbes , linux-kernel , Chris Wedgwood , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20060717210425.GA16076@kroah.com> References: <1153161320.4808.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060717210425.GA16076@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:36:16 -0700 Message-Id: <1153172176.4808.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This replaces the previous patch. Thanks, Kylie On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:35:20AM -0700, Kylene Jo Hall wrote: > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Kylene Jo Hall > > To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) > > Cc: linux-kernel , TPM Device Driver List > > , akpm@osdl.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix > > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700 > > Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared. > > This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x. > > > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > > > > PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever > > > mb() does, just hides the problem. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall > > --- > > > > --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500 > > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500 > > @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i > > iowrite32(interrupt, > > chip->vendor.iobase + > > TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality)); > > + ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality)); > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > } > > So does this replace the other tpm patch? Or should we apply both of > them? > > thanks, > > greg k-h