From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153391342.31822.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060720085636.D1947140@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 08:56 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:08:30AM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 23:57, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > of programs fail in mysterious ways. I tried to recover using xfs_repair
> > > > but I feel that my partition is thorougly borked. Of course no data was
> > > > lost due to backups but still I'd like this bug to be fixed ;-)
> > >
> > > 2.6.18-rc1 should be fine (contains the corruption fix). Did you
> > > mkfs and restore? Or at least get a full repair run? If you did,
> > > and you still see issues in .18-rc1, please let me know asap.
> >
> > Just out of interest, I've got a few XFS volumes that were created 24 months
> > ago on a machine that I upgraded to 2.6.17 about a month ago. I haven't seen
> > any crashes so far.
> >
> > Assuming I get the newest XFS repair tools on there, what's the disadvantage
> > of repairing versus creating a new filesystem? What special circumstances are
> > required to cause a crash?
>
> There should be no disadvantage to repairing. I will update the FAQ
> shortly to describe all the details of the problem, recommendations
> on how to address it, which kernel version is affected, etc.
this FAQ, is it this: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 ?
(btw, it seems that while only in the TOC once, you have the same about
2.6.17 twice..)..
which version of xfsprogs should i use while doing the xfs_check ?
>
> cheers.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-20 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 22:29 XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-18 22:57 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 8:08 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 22:56 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 10:29 ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2006-07-19 10:21 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 12:43 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 15:25 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 22:59 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:13 ` FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2006-07-20 12:42 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2006-07-20 13:28 ` David Greaves
2006-07-20 16:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 22:14 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:24 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:52 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:00 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 23:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 23:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:19 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 15:13 ` Kevin Radloff
2006-07-20 16:51 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 16:25 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-31 16:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-08-02 4:32 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 21:14 ` XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-19 23:09 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-22 16:27 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-23 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-25 20:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-25 23:10 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-28 17:01 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-28 21:48 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-29 20:22 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-07-29 22:28 ` David Chatterton
2006-07-18 23:06 ` Kevin Radloff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 14:17 Mattias Hedenskog
2006-07-19 14:59 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2006-07-19 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 5:51 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-07-19 21:09 ` Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-20 10:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153391342.31822.4.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=torsten@debian.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.