All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 06:03:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154340236.3642.11.camel@LINE> (raw)

Yes, you are right. 
I also send the same mail several ago, and get no response. You
patch is fine. But I think following code has no effect:

if (sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {

It just let UDP datagrams with checksum error be added into  UDP receive
queue, and then discard it. I think this can be used to capture a UDP
datagrams use a filter. But I if use a filter to capture a UDP
datagrams,  the code should like that:

if (!sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {

IPv6 doesn't do this, so I think delete condition 'sk->sk_filter' is
better. Do you think so?

Specially, do you try to send UDP datagrams with checksum error to echo-
udp(port 7), may be your patch will let neither udpInDatagrams nor
udpInErrors be increased. Because in my test, that datagrams can be send
to echo-udp and get a echo reply.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerrit Renker" <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error


> This has been raised earlier, cf.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660
> 
> Wei Yongjun wrote:
> |  When I send a UDP datagrams with checksum error to target, I found
that:
> |  Under IPv6, counter udpInErrors increased, but under IPv4 counter
> |  udpInDatagrams increased. I lookup into the source code, and found
that,
> |  under IPv4 UDP datagrams with checksum error will be delivered to
UDP
> |  receive queue, but IPv6 does not. IPv4 delivered into UDP receive
queue,
> |  increased udpInDatagrams, then discard it before delivered to UDP
user.
> |  RFC said udpInDatagrams is the total number of UDP datagrams
delivered
> |  to UDP users, so udpInDatagrams should not be increased while UDP
> |  datagrams with checksum error received.
> |  
> |  Refer to RFC2013:
> |    udpInDatagrams OBJECT-TYPE
> |        SYNTAX      Counter32
> |        MAX-ACCESS  read-only
> |        STATUS      current
> |        DESCRIPTION
> |                "The total number of UDP datagrams delivered to UDP
> |  users."
> |        ::= { udp 1 }
> |  
> |  Following is my patch:
> |  
> |  --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c 2006-07-31 09:33:45.392479344 -0400
> |  +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c 2006-07-31 09:34:26.430240656 -0400
> |  @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock
> |   /* FALLTHROUGH -- it's a UDP Packet */
> |   }
> |   
> |  - if (sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
> |  + if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
> |   if (__udp_checksum_complete(skb)) {
> |   UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INERRORS);
> |   kfree_skb(skb);
> |  
> |  Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
> |  
> |  
> |  -
> |  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
in
> |  the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> |  More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> |  
> |  
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


             reply	other threads:[~2006-07-31  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-31 10:03 Wei Yongjun [this message]
2006-07-31 10:42 ` [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error Herbert Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-31 11:21 Wei Yongjun
2006-07-31  8:51 Wei Yongjun
2006-07-31  8:19 ` Gerrit Renker
     [not found]   ` <075801c6b47d$08c49350$6004a8c0@WeiYongjun>
2006-07-31  8:57     ` Gerrit Renker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1154340236.3642.11.camel@LINE \
    --to=yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.