From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Oglesby <doglesby@teleformix.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:49:45 -0500
Message-ID: <1154357385.7964.1.camel@localhost>
References: <20060730223755.GA14386@hermes.uziel.local>
	 <44CD3E41.9030708@namesys.com>  <44CDBA8D.9060401@slaphack.com>
Reply-To: doglesby@teleformix.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29293-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <44CDBA8D.9060401@slaphack.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:08 -0500, David Masover wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> > It might even be socially effective to shut down reiserfs-list until
> > inclusion occurs.
> 
> Maybe.  It will be an inconvenience for me, if we have to.  I'm not even 
> on LKML, and I'd rather not be -- even this list can get noisy at times...
> 
> But I will go with it if it's what works best.

I agree with David, for whatever that is worth (I'm just a user of
ReiserFS, not a developer).

--Dan