From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] lpfc 8.1.7 : Fix failing firmware download due to mailbox delays needing to be longer
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:33:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154432023.18162.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Fix failing firmware download due to mailbox delays needing to be longer.
Signed-off-by: James Smart <James.Smart@emulex.com>
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c 2006-08-01 07:07:38.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c 2006-08-01 07:08:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -1000,7 +1000,8 @@ sysfs_mbox_read(struct kobject *kobj, ch
spin_unlock_irq(phba->host->host_lock);
rc = lpfc_sli_issue_mbox_wait (phba,
phba->sysfs_mbox.mbox,
- phba->fc_ratov * 2);
+ lpfc_mbox_tmo_val(phba,
+ phba->sysfs_mbox.mbox->mb.mbxCommand) * HZ);
spin_lock_irq(phba->host->host_lock);
}
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h 2006-07-31 10:41:15.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_crtn.h 2006-08-01 07:08:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ void lpfc_config_port(struct lpfc_hba *,
void lpfc_kill_board(struct lpfc_hba *, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *);
void lpfc_mbox_put(struct lpfc_hba *, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *);
LPFC_MBOXQ_t *lpfc_mbox_get(struct lpfc_hba *);
+int lpfc_mbox_tmo_val(struct lpfc_hba *, int);
int lpfc_mem_alloc(struct lpfc_hba *);
void lpfc_mem_free(struct lpfc_hba *);
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mbox.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mbox.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mbox.c 2006-07-31 10:41:15.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mbox.c 2006-08-01 07:08:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -651,3 +651,19 @@ lpfc_mbox_get(struct lpfc_hba * phba)
return mbq;
}
+
+int
+lpfc_mbox_tmo_val(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int cmd)
+{
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case MBX_WRITE_NV: /* 0x03 */
+ case MBX_UPDATE_CFG: /* 0x1B */
+ case MBX_DOWN_LOAD: /* 0x1C */
+ case MBX_DEL_LD_ENTRY: /* 0x1D */
+ case MBX_LOAD_AREA: /* 0x81 */
+ case MBX_FLASH_WR_ULA: /* 0x98 */
+ case MBX_LOAD_EXP_ROM: /* 0x9C */
+ return LPFC_MBOX_TMO_FLASH_CMD;
+ }
+ return LPFC_MBOX_TMO;
+}
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c 2006-08-01 07:07:38.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c 2006-08-01 07:08:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -2197,7 +2197,8 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox(struct lpfc_hba * ph
return (MBX_NOT_FINISHED);
}
/* timeout active mbox command */
- mod_timer(&psli->mbox_tmo, jiffies + HZ * LPFC_MBOX_TMO);
+ mod_timer(&psli->mbox_tmo, (jiffies +
+ (HZ * lpfc_mbox_tmo_val(phba, mb->mbxCommand))));
}
/* Mailbox cmd <cmd> issue */
@@ -2257,7 +2258,6 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox(struct lpfc_hba * ph
break;
case MBX_POLL:
- i = 0;
psli->mbox_active = NULL;
if (psli->sli_flag & LPFC_SLI2_ACTIVE) {
/* First read mbox status word */
@@ -2271,11 +2271,14 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox(struct lpfc_hba * ph
/* Read the HBA Host Attention Register */
ha_copy = readl(phba->HAregaddr);
+ i = lpfc_mbox_tmo_val(phba, mb->mbxCommand);
+ i *= 1000; /* Convert to ms */
+
/* Wait for command to complete */
while (((word0 & OWN_CHIP) == OWN_CHIP) ||
(!(ha_copy & HA_MBATT) &&
(phba->hba_state > LPFC_WARM_START))) {
- if (i++ >= 100) {
+ if (i-- <= 0) {
psli->sli_flag &= ~LPFC_SLI_MBOX_ACTIVE;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(phba->host->host_lock,
drvr_flag);
@@ -2293,7 +2296,7 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox(struct lpfc_hba * ph
/* Can be in interrupt context, do not sleep */
/* (or might be called with interrupts disabled) */
- mdelay(i);
+ mdelay(1);
spin_lock_irqsave(phba->host->host_lock, drvr_flag);
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.h
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.h 2006-08-01 07:07:38.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.h 2006-08-01 07:08:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -225,3 +225,9 @@ struct lpfc_sli {
#define LPFC_MBOX_TMO 30 /* Sec tmo for outstanding mbox
command */
+#define LPFC_MBOX_TMO_FLASH_CMD 300 /* Sec tmo for outstanding FLASH write
+ * or erase cmds. This is especially
+ * long because of the potential of
+ * multiple flash erases that can be
+ * spawned.
+ */
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-01 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-01 11:33 James Smart [this message]
2006-08-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] lpfc 8.1.7 : Fix failing firmware download due to mailbox delays needing to be longer Rolf Eike Beer
2006-08-01 13:43 ` James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154432023.18162.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.