From: keith mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: andrew <akpm@osdl.org>,
y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lhms-devel <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [6/5] enhance collistion check
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:01:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154725276.5784.1.camel@keithlap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804113245.30487789.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Okay... here is 6/5 patch..
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:15:50 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > > Maybe moving ioresouce collision check in early stage of add_memory() is good ?
> > > Yea. I am working a a full patch set for but my sparsemem and reserve
> > > add-based paths. It creates a valid_memory_add_range call at the start
> > > of add_memory. I should be posting the set in the next few hours.
> > >
> > Ah..ok. but I wrote my own patch...and testing it now..
> >
>
> This patch passed test with ia64. based on 5 patches already sent.
> plz check.
Looks good to me. Tested as works x86_64. It is required for the 4th
patch of this series.
Acked-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 3:36 [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-03 18:28 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-03 23:09 ` [Lhms-devel] " keith mannthey
2006-08-04 0:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 0:13 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 0:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 1:54 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 2:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 2:32 ` [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [6/5] enhance collistion check KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 3:09 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 21:01 ` keith mannthey [this message]
2006-08-04 3:00 ` [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi keith mannthey
2006-08-04 3:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 3:23 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 3:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 4:25 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 4:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-04 8:23 ` Mika Penttilä
2006-08-04 8:32 ` keith mannthey
2006-08-04 5:46 ` Yasunori Goto
2006-08-04 5:59 ` [Lhms-devel] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154725276.5784.1.camel@keithlap \
--to=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.