From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, davej@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] libata: implement per-dev xfermask
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:56:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154879804.22906.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D5FF90.7000602@gmail.com>
Ar Sul, 2006-08-06 am 23:41 +0900, ysgrifennodd Tejun Heo:
> I see. I have a question though. ATM, there are a few drives in the
> current #upstream which deal with PATA devices (ata_piix, pdc_adma and
> sata_promise). Will they all act correctly without the above logic? If
> so, I'll drop the above part and regenerate the tree. If not, it can
> stay till those drivers are patched.
I went through them checking earlier. The majority of chipsets snoop the
drive select bit and will generate appropriate cycles by device
according to that bit. Not everything does but I have been through and
made sure the ones that don't correctly merge timings. At least I hope I
have them all anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-06 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 21:01 [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#2 Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] [libata] some function renaming Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-09 4:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: use dummy port for stolen legacy ports Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] libata: implement dummy port Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] libata: implement per-dev xfermask Tejun Heo
2006-08-05 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-06 14:41 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-06 15:56 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-08-06 16:08 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] libata: fix several bugs in reworked legacy handling Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] libata: rework legacy handling to remove much of the cruft Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] [libata] Kill 'count' var in ata_device_add() Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] libata: replace ap->hard_port_no with ap->port_no Tejun Heo
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] libata: kill unused hard_port_no and legacy_mode Tejun Heo
2006-08-09 4:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-04 21:05 ` [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#2 Dave Jones
2006-08-04 21:13 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154879804.22906.8.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.