From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harry Butterworth Subject: Re: Re: Communicating with the domU from dom0 without Network Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1155078247.10328.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060807124015.GA3365@lxlabs.com> <20060807125754.GG3802@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <20060807133130.GA4912@lxlabs.com> <20060807133203.GL3802@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <20060807134906.GA5601@lxlabs.com> <44D767EF.4020003@epoch.ncsc.mil> <1155070472.5293.97.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1155070472.5293.97.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel Stodden Cc: xen@lxlabs.com, muli@il.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Michael LeMay List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:54 +0200, Daniel Stodden wrote: > make it absolutely clear to users, that if they wish to configure fast > host-local inter-domain-communications, they get what they desire: fast, > but host-local domain-interdependent communications. if your customer > asks for light-weight optimized inter-domain-communication, ask her if > that specific application would not rather demand for regular > inter-process-communications on a standard operating system, because > that's what they get then. The xenidc code that I wrote was an efficient interdomain transport which was compatible with a network transparent implementation. Harry.