From: "ahgu" <ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:41:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <115601c5a98b$8b856290$1f1a12ac@atitech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1124977495.20120.111.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de
I am using 2.4.18 kernel.
jffs2_erase_failed(c, jeb);is the last function before the fault condition
get triggered.
Where can I find the diff between 2.4.18 and 2.4.20?
void jffs2_erase_block(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_eraseblock
*jeb)
{
int ret;
#ifdef __ECOS
ret = jffs2_flash_erase(c, jeb);
if (!ret) {
jffs2_erase_succeeded(c, jeb);
return;
}
#else /* Linux */
struct erase_info *instr;
instr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct erase_info) + sizeof(struct
erase_priv_struct), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!instr) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "kmalloc for struct erase_info in jffs2_erase_block
failed. Refiling block for later\n");
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
list_del(&jeb->list);
list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return;
}
memset(instr, 0, sizeof(*instr));
instr->mtd = c->mtd;
instr->addr = jeb->offset;
instr->len = c->sector_size;
instr->callback = jffs2_erase_callback;
instr->priv = (unsigned long)(&instr[1]);
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->jeb = jeb;
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->c = c;
/* NAND , read out the fail counter, if possible */
if (!jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c))
jffs2_nand_read_failcnt(c,jeb);
ret = c->mtd->erase(c->mtd, instr);
if (!ret)
return;
kfree(instr);
#endif /* __ECOS */
if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EAGAIN) {
/* Erase failed immediately. Refile it on the list */
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Erase at 0x%08x failed: %d. Refiling on
erase_pending_list\n", jeb->offset, ret));
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
list_del(&jeb->list);
list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return;
}
if (ret == -EROFS)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Erase at 0x%08x failed immediately: -EROFS. Is the
sector locked?\n", jeb->offset);
else
printk(KERN_WARNING "Erase at 0x%08x failed immediately: errno %d\n",
jeb->offset, ret);
jffs2_erase_failed(c, jeb);
}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "ahgu" <ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com>
Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:27 -0400, ahgu wrote:
>> I forced the flash_erase function to fail. I expect the jffs2 will pick
>> up
>> the return error and mark the block bad and put the bad block in a
>> bad_block
>> list. But what I get is kernel failure:
>> I get similar error when I simulate a write error.
>> Am I doing the bad block simulation correctly? Is this a correct
>> response?
>> What is supposed to happen when the NAND flash grow a bad block?
>
> JFFS2 should handle this.
>
> The oops trace is worthless, as it does not show the stack trace in
> human readable form (function names decoded)
>
> Make sure that CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set in your kernel .config file.
>
> Also information about kernel version and possibly applied MTD/JFFS2
> patches is missing.
>
>
> tglx
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-25 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-25 13:27 simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang ahgu
2005-08-25 13:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-08-25 15:41 ` ahgu [this message]
2005-08-25 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='115601c5a98b$8b856290$1f1a12ac@atitech.com' \
--to=ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.