From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: Sample Rate Conversion Quality in ALSA Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:15:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1156187703.10565.117.camel@mindpipe> References: <44E9AAFA.2060400@superbug.co.uk> <20060821150338.GA3360@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Marc Brooker Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 21:07 +0200, Marc Brooker wrote: > On a related note, on an Athlon64 3200+ running Ubuntu Dapper for i386 > with backported alsa-libs 1.0.11 and alsa-plugins 1.0.11 (with > samplerate plugin) cpu usage figures (while playing a VBR mp3 using > gstreamer): > standard ALSA linear: 2% > samplerate: 6% > samplerate_medium: 9% > samplerate_best: 20% > > >From this it seems that samplerate_best is too costly, but samplerate > and samplerate_medium would be usable on most modern hardware. > It would be useful to have the same numbers for the low end of "modern hardware", like a 1Ghz fanless Via C3 board, or a Geode - the type of thing people use for MythTV boxes and what not. Lee ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642