All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify all architecture PAGE_SIZE definitions
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:51:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156521082.12011.182.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608250838410.9083@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 08:42 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I think this is a good thing to do. However, the patch as it is now is 
> difficult to review. Could you split the patch into multiple patches? One 
> patch that introduces the generic functionality and then do one patch 
> per arch? It would be best to sent the arch specific patches to the arch 
> mailing list or the arch maintainer for review.
> 
> You probably can get the generic piece into mm together with the first 
> arch specific patch (once the first arch has signed off) and then submit 
> further bits as the reviews get completed.

It _is_ too big.  However, I think doing 24 different architectures
separately would probably be a major pain, and never get done.  It would
also have to create some temporary Kconfig names (or give up the names
it uses now, which duplicate some arch code).

How about this: I'll split it up, one patch for each of the difficult
architectures: parisc, mips, sparc64, ia64, one patch for the 4k-only
page architectures, and we'll look at what's left?

-- Dave


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify all architecture PAGE_SIZE definitions
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:51:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156521082.12011.182.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608250838410.9083@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 08:42 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I think this is a good thing to do. However, the patch as it is now is 
> difficult to review. Could you split the patch into multiple patches? One 
> patch that introduces the generic functionality and then do one patch 
> per arch? It would be best to sent the arch specific patches to the arch 
> mailing list or the arch maintainer for review.
> 
> You probably can get the generic piece into mm together with the first 
> arch specific patch (once the first arch has signed off) and then submit 
> further bits as the reviews get completed.

It _is_ too big.  However, I think doing 24 different architectures
separately would probably be a major pain, and never get done.  It would
also have to create some temporary Kconfig names (or give up the names
it uses now, which duplicate some arch code).

How about this: I'll split it up, one patch for each of the difficult
architectures: parisc, mips, sparc64, ia64, one patch for the 4k-only
page architectures, and we'll look at what's left?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-25 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-24 23:44 [RFC][PATCH] unify all architecture PAGE_SIZE definitions Dave Hansen
2006-08-24 23:44 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-25 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-25 15:42   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-25 15:51   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2006-08-25 15:51     ` Dave Hansen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-24 23:44 Dave Hansen
2006-08-24 23:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2006-08-25  0:07   ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-25  0:14     ` William Lee Irwin III
2006-08-25  0:23       ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-25  0:32         ` William Lee Irwin III
2006-08-25  8:12           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-08-25  5:31 ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-25 15:03   ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-26  1:17     ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-25 21:04   ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-25  8:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-08-25 14:55   ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-25 15:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-08-25 17:16 ` David Howells
2006-08-25 17:31   ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-11  0:51 ` Jeff Dike
2006-09-11 17:33   ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-11 18:43   ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-11 23:40     ` Jeff Dike
2006-09-11 13:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-11 17:43   ` Dave Hansen
     [not found] <BFECAF9E178F144FAEF2BF4CE739C66804016FA5@exmail1.se.axis.com>
2006-08-25  5:04 ` Mikael Starvik
2006-08-25 16:06 Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1156521082.12011.182.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.