From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Re: Timer problems? From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <44F0BBB7.7030703@domain.hid> References: <1903864415@domain.hid> <1154964748.4322.31.camel@domain.hid> <44EF17E8.5040606@domain.hid> <44F0BBB7.7030703@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:12:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1156630353.4730.70.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Steve Kreyer Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org, Bernhard Walle On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 23:23 +0200, Steve Kreyer wrote: > Hi Bernhard, :) > Bernhard Walle wrote: > > Hello, > > > > first of all: you replied to a previous mail which results in a broken > > thread three in the mail client ... Pleaes create new mail for new > > requests. > > The example you've provided exits immediately here because you don't > > wait in the main() function. > > > Yes, Iam aware of this, but in fact the waiting via pause or sleep in > the Linux process (main function) > failed and results in a system lock up. The latency test issues a number of native API calls mixed with standard glibc calls. Does it run on your box? Btw, your .config shows that PM is enabled, which is a known source of latency problems; you should disable it. Additionally, make sure to read the TROUBLESHOOTING file thoroughly: a number of configuration caveats for x86 are explained, including the PM one. Last point: the kernel shipped by Kanotix might have been patched up beyond all recognition. Did the Adeos patch apply cleanly against it? -- Philippe.