From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@mail.ru>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
devel@openvz.org, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] BC: context inheriting and changing
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:11:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156965092.12403.41.camel@linuxchandra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44F4552B.8010503@sw.ru>
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 18:54 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Contains code responsible for setting BC on task,
> it's inheriting and setting host context in interrupts.
>
> Task references 2 beancounters:
> 1. exec_bc: current context. all resources are
> charged to this beancounter.
> 3. fork_bc: beancounter which is inherited by
> task's children on fork
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
>
> ---
>
> include/bc/task.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/sched.h | 5 ++++
> kernel/bc/Makefile | 1
> kernel/bc/beancounter.c | 3 ++
> kernel/bc/misc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/fork.c | 17 ++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/handle.c | 9 +++++++
> kernel/softirq.c | 8 ++++++
> 8 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- /dev/null 2006-07-18 14:52:43.075228448 +0400
> +++ ./include/bc/task.h 2006-08-28 12:54:48.000000000 +0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +/*
> + * include/bc/task.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 OpenVZ. SWsoft Inc
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __BC_TASK_H_
> +#define __BC_TASK_H_
> +
> +struct beancounter;
we can as well include beancounter.h here and avoid including it in
different files below.
> +
> +struct task_beancounter {
> + struct beancounter *exec_bc;
> + struct beancounter *fork_bc;
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS
> +
> +#define get_exec_bc() (current->task_bc.exec_bc)
> +#define set_exec_bc(new) \
> + ({ \
> + struct beancounter *old; \
> + struct task_beancounter *tbc; \
> + tbc = ¤t->task_bc; \
> + old = tbc->exec_bc; \
> + tbc->exec_bc = new; \
> + old; \
> + })
> +#define reset_exec_bc(old, exp) \
> + do { \
> + struct task_beancounter *tbc; \
> + tbc = ¤t->task_bc; \
> + BUG_ON(tbc->exec_bc != exp); \
> + tbc->exec_bc = old; \
> + } while (0)
> +
Didn't follow why the above two macros can't be functions.
> +int __must_check bc_task_charge(struct task_struct *parent,
> + struct task_struct *new);
> +void bc_task_uncharge(struct task_struct *tsk);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define get_exec_bc() (NULL)
> +#define set_exec_bc(new) (NULL)
> +#define reset_exec_bc(new, exp) do { } while (0)
> +
> +static inline __must_check int bc_task_charge(struct task_struct *parent,
> + struct task_struct *new)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void bc_task_uncharge(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +#endif
> --- ./include/linux/sched.h.bctask 2006-08-28 12:20:13.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./include/linux/sched.h 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct sched_param {
> #include <linux/timer.h>
> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>
> +#include <bc/task.h>
> +
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> struct exec_domain;
> @@ -1048,6 +1050,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> spinlock_t delays_lock;
> struct task_delay_info *delays;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS
> + struct task_beancounter task_bc;
> +#endif
> };
>
> static inline pid_t process_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
> --- ./kernel/bc/Makefile.bctask 2006-08-28 12:43:34.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/bc/Makefile 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
> #
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS) += beancounter.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS) += misc.o
> --- ./kernel/bc/beancounter.c.bctask 2006-08-28 12:49:07.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/bc/beancounter.c 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -238,6 +238,9 @@ void __init bc_init_early(void)
> spin_lock_init(&bc_hash_lock);
> slot = &bc_hash[bc_hash_fn(bc->bc_id)];
> hlist_add_head(&bc->hash, slot);
> +
> + current->task_bc.exec_bc = get_beancounter(bc);
> + current->task_bc.fork_bc = get_beancounter(bc);
> }
>
> void __init bc_init_late(void)
> --- /dev/null 2006-07-18 14:52:43.075228448 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/bc/misc.c 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/*
> + * kernel/bc/misc.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 OpenVZ. SWsoft Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +#include <bc/beancounter.h>
> +#include <bc/task.h>
task.h is included via sched.h, not needed here.
> +
> +int bc_task_charge(struct task_struct *parent, struct task_struct *new)
> +{
> + struct task_beancounter *old_bc;
> + struct task_beancounter *new_bc;
> + struct beancounter *bc;
> +
> + old_bc = &parent->task_bc;
> + new_bc = &new->task_bc;
> +
> + bc = old_bc->fork_bc;
> + new_bc->exec_bc = get_beancounter(bc);
> + new_bc->fork_bc = get_beancounter(bc);
> + return 0;
> +}
There is no failures, why not return void ?
> +
> +void bc_task_uncharge(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + put_beancounter(tsk->task_bc.exec_bc);
> + put_beancounter(tsk->task_bc.fork_bc);
> +}
> --- ./kernel/fork.c.bctask 2006-08-28 12:20:13.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/fork.c 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> #include <linux/taskstats_kern.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
>
> +#include <bc/task.h>
> +
not needed as already included in sched.h
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -103,12 +105,18 @@ kmem_cache_t *vm_area_cachep;
> /* SLAB cache for mm_struct structures (tsk->mm) */
> static kmem_cache_t *mm_cachep;
>
> -void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +static void __free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> free_thread_info(tsk->thread_info);
> rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk);
> free_task_struct(tsk);
> }
> +
> +void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + bc_task_uncharge(tsk);
> + __free_task(tsk);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task);
>
> void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
> @@ -983,6 +991,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
> if (!p)
> goto fork_out;
>
> + if (bc_task_charge(current, p))
> + goto bad_charge;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled);
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->softirqs_enabled);
> @@ -1293,7 +1304,9 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_count:
> atomic_dec(&p->user->processes);
> free_uid(p->user);
> bad_fork_free:
> - free_task(p);
> + bc_task_uncharge(p);
> +bad_charge:
> + __free_task(p);
> fork_out:
> return ERR_PTR(retval);
> }
> --- ./kernel/irq/handle.c.bctask 2006-07-10 12:39:20.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/irq/handle.c 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>
> +#include <bc/beancounter.h>
> +#include <bc/task.h>
same here
> +
> #include "internals.h"
>
> /**
> @@ -166,6 +169,9 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
> struct irqaction *action;
> unsigned int status;
> + struct beancounter *bc;
> +
> + bc = set_exec_bc(&init_bc);
>
> kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
> if (CHECK_IRQ_PER_CPU(desc->status)) {
> @@ -178,6 +184,8 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned
> desc->chip->ack(irq);
> action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, regs, desc->action);
> desc->chip->end(irq);
> +
> + reset_exec_bc(bc, &init_bc);
> return 1;
> }
>
> @@ -246,6 +254,7 @@ out:
> desc->chip->end(irq);
> spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
>
> + reset_exec_bc(bc, &init_bc);
> return 1;
> }
>
> --- ./kernel/softirq.c.bctask 2006-08-28 12:20:13.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/softirq.c 2006-08-28 12:52:11.000000000 +0400
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
>
> +#include <bc/beancounter.h>
> +#include <bc/task.h>
same here
> +
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> /*
> - No shared variables, all the data are CPU local.
> @@ -209,6 +212,9 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
> __u32 pending;
> int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART;
> int cpu;
> + struct beancounter *bc;
> +
> + bc = set_exec_bc(&init_bc);
>
> pending = local_softirq_pending();
> account_system_vtime(current);
> @@ -247,6 +253,8 @@ restart:
>
> account_system_vtime(current);
> _local_bh_enable();
> +
> + reset_exec_bc(bc, &init_bc);
> }
>
> #ifndef __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-30 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-29 14:33 [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v3) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-29 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] introduce atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 9:59 ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-30 14:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-30 10:51 ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-30 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-30 11:54 ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-30 16:58 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-30 17:25 ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-31 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-29 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] BC: kconfig Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 4:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-08-29 14:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] BC: beancounters core (API) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 18:58 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-30 19:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] BC: context inheriting and changing Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 19:11 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2006-08-29 14:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] BC: user interface (syscalls) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 19:15 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-29 14:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] BC: kernel memory (core) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-29 18:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-09-04 12:21 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-04 15:45 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-29 20:29 ` [ckrm-tech] " Dave Hansen
2006-09-04 12:23 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-05 16:21 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-30 19:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-29 14:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] BC: kernel memory (marks) Kirill Korotaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1156965092.12403.41.camel@linuxchandra \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@mail.ru \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=saw@sw.ru \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.