From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932219AbWHaR0c (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932242AbWHaR0c (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:32 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.4]:47610 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932216AbWHaR0b (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] From: Trond Myklebust To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1157045173.11347.94.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.2, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 1.80, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's > option. > > Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's > tree, at your option. I don't mind pulling them into my tree, but since Christoph had objections to earlier implementations, and specifically asked me to put a hold on the non-NFS related patches, then I'd first like an ACK from him stating that he is now happy with the way those objections have been handled in the updates. Cheers, Trond From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1157045173.11347.94.camel@localhost> References: <20060830135503.98f57ff3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830125239.6504d71a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060830193153.12446.24095.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <27414.1156970238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9849.1157018310@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's > option. > > Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's > tree, at your option. I don't mind pulling them into my tree, but since Christoph had objections to earlier implementations, and specifically asked me to put a hold on the non-NFS related patches, then I'd first like an ACK from him stating that he is now happy with the way those objections have been handled in the updates. Cheers, Trond