From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:34:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157092863.2878.13.camel@ux156>
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:41, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:37 +0800, Hong Liu wrote:
> >
> > + local->sta_scanning = 1;
> > + if (local->hw->hw_scan)
> > + return local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
> > +
>
> My question still stands, is it proper to assign sta_scanning to 1 even
> if the function returns an error?
>
> johannes
>
>
Thanks for point this out!
Change to only set sta_scanning to 1 if hw_scan successes.
Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
diff --git a/include/net/d80211.h b/include/net/d80211.h
index 42fdbf7..1caa8a9 100644
--- a/include/net/d80211.h
+++ b/include/net/d80211.h
@@ -600,6 +600,10 @@ struct ieee80211_hw {
int (*passive_scan)(struct net_device *dev, int state,
struct ieee80211_scan_conf *conf);
+ /* Ask the hardware to service the scan request, no need to start
+ * the scan state machine in stack. */
+ int (*hw_scan)(struct net_device *dev, u8 *ssid, size_t len);
+
/* return low-level statistics */
int (*get_stats)(struct net_device *dev,
struct ieee80211_low_level_stats *stats);
@@ -906,6 +910,8 @@ void ieee80211_tx_led(int state, struct
*/
void ieee80211_rx_led(int state, struct net_device *dev);
+/* called by driver to notify scan status completed */
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev);
/* IEEE 802.11 defines */
diff --git a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
index 557ba17..1f60a22 100644
--- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
+++ b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
@@ -2410,6 +2410,29 @@ static int ieee80211_active_scan(struct
}
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct ieee80211_local *local = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
+ union iwreq_data wrqu;
+
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
+ local->sta_scanning = 0;
+ local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
+
+ memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
+ wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
+
+ if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
+ struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
+ if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
+ (!ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
+ !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
+ ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_scan_completed);
+
static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void *ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = ptr;
@@ -2418,7 +2441,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
struct ieee80211_hw_modes *mode;
struct ieee80211_channel *chan;
int skip;
- union iwreq_data wrqu;
unsigned long next_delay = 0;
if (!local->sta_scanning)
@@ -2435,20 +2457,8 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
"operational channel after scan\n",
dev->name);
}
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
- local->sta_scanning = 0;
- local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
- memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
- wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
- if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
- struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata =
- IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
- struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
- if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
- (ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
- !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
- ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
- }
+
+ ieee80211_scan_completed(dev);
return;
}
skip = !(local->enabled_modes & (1 << mode->mode));
@@ -2549,6 +2559,13 @@ int ieee80211_sta_req_scan(struct net_de
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: starting scan\n", dev->name);
+ if (local->hw->hw_scan) {
+ int rc = local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
+ if (!rc)
+ local->sta_scanning = 1;
+ return rc;
+ }
+
ieee80211_sta_save_oper_chan(dev);
local->sta_scanning = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-01 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-25 8:32 [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback Hong Liu
2006-08-29 12:08 ` Johannes Berg
2006-08-30 17:10 ` Jiri Benc
2006-08-30 18:36 ` Mohamed Abbas
2006-09-01 3:37 ` Hong Liu
2006-09-01 6:41 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-01 7:34 ` Hong Liu [this message]
2006-09-21 19:22 ` Jiri Benc
2009-04-06 15:12 ` oterito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong \
--to=hong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.