From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GKXPd-00030E-8m for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:40:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k859bPhx002130 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:25 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02054-02 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from dynamic2.rpnet.com (dynamic2.rpnet.com [192.168.1.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k859bKkP002123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:20 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions In-Reply-To: <44FD3519.7000000@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <44FD3519.7000000@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:37:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1157449040.26547.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: gtk 2.6/2.8 vs 2.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:40:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 10:28 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > A while ago gtk 2.10 was added to OE with a negative default preference since not all the > patches have been forward ported yet. Gtk 2.10 also bumped their ABI version to 2.10, > which leads to some interesting problems: > > * do_install for packages dependant on gtk+ breaks since ${libdir}/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/ is now > ${libdir}/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/ I think Graeme's solution should solve this. > * some package build against 2.8 but not against 2.10 and vice versa These need versioned DEPENDS eg. DEPENDS = "gtk+ (>= 2.10.0)". Could someone try and see if it breaks anything with the current bitbake? I'd like to see the metadata starting to contain this data, even if bitbake itself doesn't use it yet so when we do implement it, it should all just work... Cheers, Richard