From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai + PREEMPT_RT
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <44FEA7F5.6090409@domain.hid>
References: <1157501591.22250.25.camel@domain.hid>
	<44FEA7F5.6090409@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 07:51:32 -0700
Message-Id: <1157554292.3541.28.camel@domain.hid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:50 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Or even better, is anyone already doing work with these two
> > technologies combined?
> 
> There once existed a combo patch (that I don't find ATM) of an ancient
> -rt version + old Adeos, a combination that will more or less
> automatically come again when PREEMPT_RT is mainline. Porting the
> nucleus over PREEMPT_RT so that the skins can run "natively" is another
> task yet to begin. Anyway, we are already including this perspective in
> current design decisions when subsystems are revised or enhanced.

So I take it that designing the combined version is still taking place?

It sounds like the current direction is more of a straight merge. 
Since PREEMPT_RT and Xenomai are somewhat parallel in purpose would
there be any room to eliminate duplication between the two?

Daniel