From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>,
jt@hpl.hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Javier Achirica <achirica@gmail.com>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
"James P. Ketrenos" <ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com>,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu>,
Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@amsat.org>,
Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>,
Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Alternate WE-21 support (core API)
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:42:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157611356.2857.0.camel@ux156> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060906205538.GA29767@tuxdriver.com>
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 16:55 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> Is this patch acceptable to the group? Does it make things better?
> Or worse? Did I leave-out anything that should still go in? Did I
> take too much?
Looks good to me.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 0:56 [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API) Jean Tourrilhes
2006-08-31 13:32 ` Johannes Berg
2006-08-31 13:51 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-08-31 14:00 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-06 20:55 ` [RFC] Alternate " John W. Linville
2006-09-06 21:09 ` Michael Buesch
2006-09-06 21:30 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-08 14:29 ` John W. Linville
2006-09-08 16:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-08 20:04 ` John W. Linville
2006-09-11 9:08 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <20060911162608.GA31459@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
[not found] ` <1158050637.2854.16.camel@ux156>
2006-09-12 16:17 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-13 6:17 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-06 21:43 ` Larry Finger
2006-09-07 6:42 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2006-08-31 17:12 ` [PATCH 2.6.18] " Jean Tourrilhes
2006-08-31 17:57 ` Michael Buesch
2006-09-01 6:56 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-01 6:54 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-01 16:35 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-01 18:55 ` Michael Buesch
2006-09-01 22:10 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-02 0:47 ` Michael Buesch
2006-09-04 8:17 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-04 8:35 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-04 14:13 ` Stuffed Crust
2006-09-05 17:06 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-09-01 22:27 ` Ulrich Kunitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157611356.2857.0.camel@ux156 \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=achirica@gmail.com \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkmaline@cc.hut.fi \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pe1rxq@amsat.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=simon@thekelleys.org.uk \
--cc=vda@ilport.com.ua \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.