All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jeff Webb <jeff.webb@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai v2.2.3
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:22:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158765729.5043.4.camel@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451153D5.2080200@domain.hid>

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 09:44 -0500, Jeff Webb wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:01 -0500, Jeff Webb wrote:
> >> Jeff Webb wrote:
> >>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>>> Here is the third maintenance release for the v2.2.x branch.
> >>>> ...
> >>> This release works fine on my 2.6 kernel x86 machine, with the exception 
> >>> of the FPU problems noted elsewhere.
> >>>
> >>> I have the following problems with my 2.4 kernel x86 machine:
> >>>  * The latency and switchtest test programs yield segmentation faults.
> >>>  * My own user-space test programs seg fault.
> >>>
> >>> Things that work:
> >>>  * The kernel boots and runs fine.
> >>>  * xeno_native, _posix, _rtai all insert and remove without problems.
> >>>  * Some simple kernel module test programs work fine.
> >>>
> >>> I am using the same config as I was for 2.2.2 (which worked fine), but I 
> >>> am running a slightly newer kernel version (2.4.33.3 as opposed to 2.4.32).
> >> I was able to build a working xenomai-2.2.3 by using linux-2.4.32 and adeos-ipipe-2.4.32-i386-1.2-07.patch.  The latency and switchtest programs seem to work now.  My problematic build used linux-2.4.33.3 and the adeos-ipipe-2.4.33-i386-1.3-00.patch.  I used the same kernel config for both builds.  
> >>
> >> So, does this mean the problem is with the ipipe patch?
> >>
> > 
> > The problem also occurs with older patches, and it looks like extremely
> > volatile, depending on various parameters, including the CPU
> > generation/brand, so I tend to think that this issue is not directly
> > related to the recent Adeos changes, but might trigger more easily with
> > the latest patch on your box. Could you try the following patch against
> > vanilla 2.2.3, on all your failing configs so far, and let us know of
> > the outcome? TIA,
> 
> Sorry for not being more clear.  This appears to be a separate problem from the FPU issue.  At least the symptoms are different...  I have only seen this problem on my xenomai-2.2.3/linux-2.4.33.3 (ipipe-1.3) build.  The symptom is that xeno-load gives a segmentation fault in the latency program (switchtest suffers the exact same problem).  A couple of my own userspace RT test programs seg fault as well.  Look at the latency output near the bottom of my original email to see what I mean:
> 
>   https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2006-09/msg00152.html
> 
> Switching to xenomai-2.2.3/linux-2.4.32 (ipipe-1.2) fixed this problem.
> Do you agree that this appears to be a different bug?

Ah, ok. Yes, clearly, this sounds different.

>   Sorry for the confusion... I am trying to debug two or three different problems at the same time. 
> Maybe I should have waited until the FPU bug was solved to report this.

No problem, I mistakenly made the connection between both issues. I'm
going to fire up a test box with 2.4.33.3 over Adeos 1-3.00 + v2.2.3 and
see what happens. More later.

> 
> I have not experienced the FPU-related switchtest error on my 2.4 machine.
> My 2.6 machine exhibits the problem, so I will certainly test your patch on that machine to see the effect.
> 

TIA,

> Thanks!
> 
> -Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xenomai-help mailing list
> Xenomai-help@domain.hid
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
-- 
Philippe.




  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-20 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-18  7:28 [Xenomai-core] Xenomai v2.2.3 Philippe Gerum
2006-09-18 21:58 ` [Xenomai-help] " Jeff Webb
2006-09-19 22:01   ` Jeff Webb
2006-09-20  9:24     ` Philippe Gerum
2006-09-20 14:44       ` Jeff Webb
2006-09-20 15:22         ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
2006-09-20 16:14         ` Philippe Gerum
2006-09-20 18:24           ` Jeff Webb
2006-09-20 18:33             ` Philippe Gerum
2006-09-20 20:02               ` Jeff Webb
2006-09-20 20:19                 ` Jeff Webb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1158765729.5043.4.camel@domain.hid \
    --to=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=jeff.webb@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.