From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <4516F0D1.3010800@domain.hid> References: <4516F0D1.3010800@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:08:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1159135692.4971.68.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: adeos-ipipe-2.6.18-ppc-1.4-00.patch, first version Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Grandegger Cc: adeos-main@gna.org, xenomai@xenomai.org On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 22:55 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > attached you will find a first version of the PPC ADEOS-IPipe patch for > Linux 2.6.18 (from kernel.org) for review. I have also included a > commented log file with more information on the porting of > adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-ppc-1.4-00 to Linux 2.6.18. It works with a recent > version of Xenomai. > Thanks, at first sight, this looks good. I don't see any obvious problem in the tracer code either. Anyway, I will play with it asap. > The patch currently only supports devices in the "arch/ppc" tree with > the option "CONFIG_PPC_MERGE" not set. Porting the "arch/powerpc" tree > requires further effort and I need a test system as well. Puh, let's > hope that the merge ppc -> powerpc will be completed soon. > > The idle loop is not yet working for 6xx and I have disabled it for > this reason (check arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c). It needs further > debugging. I hope to find more time beginning of October. Ok, thanks. Btw, returning from NAP on 6xx is done through an exception, right? If so, maybe we have a problem with this particular exception/interrupt branching directly to transfer_to_handler_full (i.e. the vanilla way) without being known from the Adeos pipeline, albeit it should? (red blinking warning: this is just a wild guess). > > I have tested the patch on some AMCC 4xx system, on a MPC 8560 (85xx) > and MPC 834x (6xx). I have also not yet tested the IPIPE tracer. I'll give it a try too on a mpc52xx. Thanks again. -- Philippe.