From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GToou-0002in-4G for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:04:36 -0700 Received: from gwu.lbox.cz ([62.245.111.132]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GToos-0005x3-Fd for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:04:36 -0700 Received: from linuxbox.linuxbox.cz (linuxbox.linuxbox.cz [10.76.66.10]) by gwu.lbox.cz (Sendmail) with ESMTP id k9104TqY015044 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:04:29 +0200 Received: from nbnik.linuxbox.cz (nbnik.linuxbox.cz [10.76.66.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by linuxbox.linuxbox.cz (Sendmail) with ESMTP id k9104MuO015309 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:04:23 +0200 From: Nikola Ciprich In-Reply-To: <20060930235752.GA16968@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <451E9BAB.5030009@linuxbox.cz> <20060930214902.GA16457@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <451EEB99.6030406@linuxbox.cz> <20060930235752.GA16968@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 03:04:22 +0300 Message-Id: <1159661062.2940.17.camel@nik-nb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] SKAS mode not working, x86_64 SMP host, x86_64 guest, problems with noprocmm Reply-To: nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Where in the shutdown process is this? There have been some previous > reports of hangs during swapoff which I have been unable to reproduce. > I spent part of a day last week pushing UMLs deeply into swap and > shutting them down, always successfully. it always hangs executing /sbin/halt > > The SIGVTALRM is normal - that's just the timer. That strace you sent > looks like the idle loop, so as far as the kernel is concerned, > everything is fine. it's consuming all available host CPU time, it's certainly cycling as fast as possible > > > and regarding /proc/mm, shouldn't this mm64 file be used? or what's it > > used for? > > /proc/mm64? What would it do that /proc/mm doesn't? well, I must admit I don't know what's difference between two at all, I was just guessing. Is there some documentation about it? I wasn't able to find nothing which would explain it... > > Jeff > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel