From: "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@us.ibm.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:49:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1159811383.27206.25.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061002154857.GA1730@redhat.com>
I wonder if some of the smbios tables are squashed... I have [much
to my chagrin] a hard-coded the starting address and size of the
tables:
/* These constants must agree with the ACPI e820 memory map as defined
in tools/libxc/xc_hvm_build.c and the address the ROMBIOS pulls the
SMBIOS entry point from in the smbios_init subroutine.
*/
#define SMBIOS_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS 0x9f000
#define SMBIOS_SIZE_LIMIT 0x800
I'll look at what data I get from a 64-bit domU as soon as I can get to
my VT machine. You're welcome to futz around as well. The dmidecode
isn't terribly difficult to read. I've also written a tool to examine
memory by physical (will be pseudo-physical in this case) address that
I'd be happy to share.
Peace.
Andrew
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 16:48 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:15:58AM -0400, Andrew D. Ball wrote:
> > Please post the domU's configuration. Looks like the type 4 (cpu
> > information) generation is broken.
>
> Here's the config from my RHEL-3, x86_64 guest
>
> # Automatically generated xen config file
> name = "rhel3x86_64"
> builder = "hvm"
> memory = "500"
> disk = [ 'file:/xen/rhel3x86_64.img,hda,w', ]
> vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3e:05:eb:04, bridge=xenbr0', ]
> uuid = "dbc4c892-4b67-bc7a-895a-a6b5f56ff061"
> device_model = "/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm"
> kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
> vnc=1
> vncunused=1
> apic=1
> acpi=0
> pae=1
> vcpus=4
> serial = "pty"
> on_reboot = 'restart'
> on_crash = 'restart'
>
> > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 19:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > I was running some tests of HVM guests on Fedora Core 6, test3 and came
> > > across a potential issue with SMBIOS data. When running dmidecode in the
> > > guest VMs it reports that the actual SMBIOS data size, does not match
> > > the advertised size. eg
> > >
> > > "Wrong DMI structures length: 439 bytes announced, structures occupy 363 bytes."
> > >
> > > I've tried this in a variety of guest OS (RHEL-3 32-bit, RHEL-3 64-bit,
> > > RHEL-4 64-bit) all the same results. The host is running FC6 test3, but
> > > the bit of code responsible for constructing the SMBIOS tables is identical
> > > to that on the vanilla xen-unstable.hg repository. I'm not familiar
> > > enough with SMBIOS specs / code to determine where the mistake in the
> > > length calculation is though...
> > >
> > > Is anyone else seeing this length mismatch in HVM guests ?
> > >
> > > FYI, we're tracking this as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207501
> > >
>
>
> Dan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-27 18:03 Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data Daniel P. Berrange
2006-10-02 14:10 ` Andrew D. Ball
2006-10-02 17:13 ` Keir Fraser
2006-10-02 17:52 ` Andrew D. Ball
2006-10-03 6:47 ` Keir Fraser
2006-10-03 20:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
[not found] ` <1159802159.27206.15.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <20061002154857.GA1730@redhat.com>
2006-10-02 17:49 ` Andrew D. Ball [this message]
2006-10-03 14:53 ` Andrew D. Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1159811383.27206.25.camel@localhost \
--to=aball@us.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.