From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:31171 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932524AbWJBVQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:16:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: <20061002.141209.21618299.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20061002132116.2663d7a3.akpm@osdl.org> <20061002201836.GB31365@elte.hu> <20061002.141209.21618299.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:18:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1159823924.1386.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, dtor@mail.ru, greg@kroah.com, david-b@pacbell.net, stern@rowland.harvard.edu List-ID: On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:12 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Linus Torvalds > Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT) > > > So if the patch works against my current tree, and nobody objects, I can > > certainly apply it. > > > > So speak up, people... > > Since it provides a suitable nestability of the regs setting, I have > no objections. ACK tglx